Possible Points for Each Area |
||||
|
0-5 Falls Far Below |
6-10 Approaches |
11-15 Meets |
16-20 Exceeds |
Content |
No evidence of subject knowledge; Information is inaccurate or not given. |
Some evidence of accurate information; Research does not show use of more than one source. |
Adequate evidence of accurate information; More than one source was used. |
Clear evidence of complete and accurate information; More than one source was used; Information is given clearly and concisely. |
Mechanics |
No evidence of proofreading; More than 8 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. |
Some evidence of proofreading; 5-7 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. |
Adequate evidence of proofreading; 3-4 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. |
Clear evidence of proofreading; less than 3 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. |
Layout/Design |
No evidence of a plan for a clear, varied PowerPoint; Graphics and colors may be too overwhelming and difficult to follow. |
Some evidence of a plan for a clear, varied PowerPoint; Graphics and colors are less overwhelming. |
Adequate evidence of a plan for a clear, varied PowerPoint; Graphics go with topic. |
Clear evidence of a plan for a clear, varied PowerPoint; Fonts and graphics go with topic - easy to understand. |
Creativity/Originality |
No evidence of any unique PowerPoint quality or new thought. |
Some evidence of unique PowerPoint qualities but little original thought or inventiveness. |
Adequate evidence of unique PowerPoint qualities and offers some new insight into the topic. |
Clear evidence of unique PowerPoint qualities. Contains many examples of ideas that are fresh, original, or inventive. |